War seems to be a tool for Need in Politics and Philosophy

war in need

2022

The First Year of Fading Europe
Europ lost its position as a top politics power from 2022.

1. Europe tears itself by a means of a war.
The War on the Ukraine territory is essentially a war to divide Europe. One big thing related to the main goal and eventual result of this war is to build a solid Ukraine Trench.
2. A solid Ukraine Trench will separates Europe into "the Europe" part and "the Russia" part. The more brutal the war does, the stronger this Ukraine Trench becomes.
3. Europe is with colonized characters other than as a top politic power.
4. Passively and compelled to participate in a war to weaken itself, Europe actually played the role as an imperial colony.

Europe loses its position as a top politics power

Expelling Russia from Europe leads to the at least following outcomes.
1.Europe loses geopolitical depth.
2.Europe loses its historic opportunity to settle oil in Euros.
3.Europe lost its raw materials supply base.
4.The reacting module is in hostility and weakening instead of mutual complementarity and enhancement between "Europe" and Russia.
5.A solid Ukraine Trench will separate Russia from "Europe" for at least 50 years. These two sides will be in continuously increasing military investment.
6.The Ukraine Trench will also block direct train connecting China to Northern and Central Europe.
7.China will change its policy from supporting Europe as one of three polars. Other countries also lose their expect on Europe as a top power in world. As soon as China and America fall into a violent collision, dragging Europe into chaos will be a major option for China.
8.Not only Ukraine, also Europe will be in a long-term chaos. Any attempt to deprive Russian of their European identify will place Europe into long-term chaos.

2026

The First Year of G2 in 2026

1. China's Cross-Strait unification Action in 2026 starts the G2 age. It is likely to happen in anyday from April to September. And it should finish by October.
2. The USA theorically has two response ways, pre-reaction and post-one. But the pre-reaction way likely has no chance to be selected. Tree packages are there in the post-reaction tool-case, including appeasement plan, full-scale economic warfare, and full-scale military warfare.
3. Japan's Struggle. Japan must dance following the rhythm of the Sino-USA fighting.
4.Korea's thorn path. South Korea's pain is so closely connecting to reactions that China, the USA, North Korea, Japan, and Russia selected.
5.Taiwan's destiny. Taiwan has lost the chance to get "different system under one country".

China launches the Cross-Strait Unification Action in 2026.

1. Other Top Powers are virtually powerless to prevent, postpone, stop, or reverse this action.
2. How America responds will determine how chaotic the situation is.
3. Japan and South Korea do not have the initiative to choose their ways. Their reponse strategies wave following tidal up or down. They have a similar prospect, getting off from the scope of sea power and going to be covered under land power in the future, sooner or latter.
4. Once America and China fall into a violent collision, Europe will be forced into a chess game again. Ukraine, Turkey,Iran, and Palestine will be big weights.
5. Taiwan's destiny is certainly sure. Taiwan may get a mask of "two systems under one country" , but without any substance. Martial law may last 30 to 50 years until two or three passages firmly tie Taiwan and the mainland together. These connecting channels will deprive Taiwan of its sea power feature and weaken the sea power attributes of Japan and South Korea as well.
6.China will "leak" its credible nuclear forces (about 3000 warheads) around the end of 2025. This is the premise to completely eliminate the nuclear option from the Sino-US conflict playbook.

Advance Notice for Coming Papers

Nation War Strength

Nation War Strength

29 March 2023

Expected showing up in June 2024

國家戰爭強度

國家戰爭強度

29 March 2023

Expected showing up in June 2024

中國武統方案(9)：台灣之宿命（第四部：武統後的中長期治理方案探討）

中國武統方案(9)：台灣之宿命（第四部：武統後的中長期治理方案探討）

03 May 2023

預告一： 1.1 台灣統一的和平模式幾乎不存在於現實，幾乎可以肯定地認為統一必定落實在武力途徑上； 1.2 2022年8月10白皮書上明確地暗示（接近於明示）：台灣的兩制方案未定；台灣的兩制要來談； 1.3...

帝國興亡周期（研究提綱）

帝國興亡周期（研究提綱）

09 May 2023

The Rise and Fall of Empirs(Research Outline); Expected showing up in Aug 2024. دورة صعود وسقوط الإمبراطوريات...

戰爭的各種屬性

戰爭的各種屬性

11 September 2023

准备中讨论战争的各层次各维度的各种属性

Power Gap Cycle-research outline

Power Gap Cycle-research outline

20 March 2024

I. Empire rising cycle coworks with Power Gap Cycle II. Exsampled from Chinese history III. Exsamples...

帝国兴亡周期-（研究提纲）

帝国兴亡周期-（研究提纲）

20 March 2024

帝国兴亡周期严格地同步于“权力极差周期” 中国例证欧洲例证定义，与规则定义“权力极差” 权力秩序分级构成权力极差的获得与消减过程

4-02 比較加拿大與中國，哪個國家給予其國民更多的自由？

How do you refer to freedom? Which parts are most important for ordinary people in ordinary life? In your intuition and first impressions, which country gave more freedom to its residents who are living in Canada or China?

4-02 Compared China to Canada, which country grants its residents more freedom?

4-01 與中國人相比，你認為歐洲人的自主性更強還是依賴性更強？

Compared to Chinese, do you think Europeans have more autonomy or more dependence?

4-01 Compared to Chinese, do you think Europeans have more autonomy or more dependence?

Compared to Chinese, do you think Europeans have more autonomy or more dependence?

3-07 為什麼中國人支持中央集權制度2千年，而歐洲人一直支持封建制度以及由封建制度演變的分權制度？

Why had the bottom people in ancient China supported a centralization political system for more than 2,000 years, while the bottom people in Europe support a political system of decentralization or co-governance until today?

3-07 Why people in ancient China supported centralization system while Europeans support decentralization until today?

3-06 從什麼時候起，歐洲底層人民介入政治進程（民族特徵形成，國家特徵形成）？

When did the bottom people in Europe have the awareness or capacity to intervene in the political process to change their nation/ state/ or country?

3-06 When European bottom people intervene in the political process?

When did the bottom people in Europe have the awareness or capacity to intervene in the political process to change their nation/ state/ or country?

3-05 如何評價聖女貞德的歷史意義？

How to evaluate the historical significance of Joan of Arc?Perhaps I am running my mind too far. Personally, I see the Joan of Arc incident as the most significant event in modern Europe. It was the beginning. From this event onwards, the lower classes in Europe became actively involved in the political...

3-05 How to evaluate the historical significance of Joan of Arc?

3-04 如何比較現代英國的《大憲章》事件和中國古代趙氏家族恢復貴族地位的事件。

What are the similarities or essential differences between the British Magna Carta incident in modern Britian and the event to restore the aristocaritic status to Zhao family’s by the king of Jin state in ancient China? The British Magna Carta was essentially a complex process of nobility limiting...

3-04 Compare British Magna Carta event in mordern Britian to Restoring the aristocaritic to Zhao Family's in ancient China

3-03 如何比較現代議會、行政和立法分享權力的政治制度，與國王、教會和貴族分權的封建制度，它们的異同

How do you compare a political system shared by parliament, executive, and legislature to the co-governance system by the king, church, and aristocrats?Compare the similarities and differences between a political system sharing its power with the legislature, the executive and the judiciary and another...

3-03 Compare shared governance by parliament, executive, and legislature to the co-governance by King, church, and aristocrats

3-02 如何評價英國《大憲章》事件的歷史意義？

3-02 How do evalute the historical significance of the British Magna Carta? Whatever the historical record, and however many changes the Magna Carta of Britain has undergone, it embodies a core fact. The nobles can restrict the power of the Crown. Through the history of multiple regency administrations,...

3-02 How do evalute the historical significance of the British Magna Carta?

3-01 為什麼封建制度在歐洲一直持續到現代，而在中國卻在兩千多年前就停止了？

3-01 Why did the feudal system last in Europe until modern times, but it stopped more than 2,000 years ago in China? There are some people refer to the history of ancient China from the Qin to the Qing dynasty as the feudal era. But for my instinct, this is not true. The feudal era is characterised by...

3-01 Why did the feudal system last in Europe until modern times, but it stopped more than 2,000 years ago in China?

2-04 美國如何控制或管理大量的歐洲領導人？

2-04 Why America can control or manage lots of European leaders? How it does?

2-04 How America can control or manage lots of European leaders?

2-04 Why America can control or manage lots of European leaders? How it does?

2-03 為什麼很多歐洲領導人對自己的國家利益失去了判斷力？或為什麼這種政治家能成功當選？

2-03 Why lots of European leaders lost their judgement on their own national interests? Why this kind of politician were elected successfully?

2-03 Why lots of European leaders lost their judgement on their own national interests? or Why this kind of politician were elected successfully?

2-03 Why lots of European leaders lost their judgement on their own national interests? Why this kind of politician were elected successfully?

2-02 為什麼很多歐洲領導人追隨美國的方向而不是自己的國家利益？

2-02 Why lots of European leaders follow America’s orientation instead of their own national interests?

2-02 Why lots of European leaders follow America's orientation instead of their own national interests?

2-02 Why lots of European leaders follow America’s orientation instead of their own national interests?

2-01 為什麼歐洲人或歐洲領導人支持一場削弱和傷害歐洲的戰爭？

2-01 Why European or European leaders support a war to weaken and hurt Europe?

2-01 Why European or European leaders support a war to weaken and hurt Europe?

2-01 Why European or European leaders support a war to weaken and hurt Europe?

1-07 如果有人說歐洲是美國的殖民地，你會怎麼想？

1-07 How do you think if somebody says Europe is a colony of the USA?

1-07 How do you think if somebody says Europe is a colony of the USA?

1-07 How do you think if somebody says Europe is a colony of the USA?

1-06 歐洲統一的先決條件和機會

Please imagine what are the possible prerequisites and opportunities for European unification? What can stimulate these opportunities?

1-06 Prerequisites and opportunities for European unification

Please imagine what are the possible prerequisites and opportunities for European unification? What can stimulate these opportunities?

First-released concept statement

The creators below claim their copyright for the concepts below with good reason.

Any individual, group, or organization that develops, interprets, recreates, expands, or limits the scope of these concepts within the disciplines of political science, history, and philosophy must respect the rights of the original authors.

These rights are not only based on past and present legal provisions, but also apply to legal provisions issued in the future.

[Go DETAILS]

First Release Date	Publishing Date	First-released Concept in Declearation	Creator
June 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	The Ukraine Trench	Ye QiQuan
April 26, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	The Confined Walls in Russia-Ukraine War	Ye QiQuan
May 23, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	The Somaliization of Ukraine	Ye QiQuan
May 23, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	The Yugoslavization of Ukraine	Ye QiQuan
May 23, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	Russia is virtually invincible, at least by 2026	Ye QiQuan
June 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	A war to divide and weaken Europe:	Ye QiQuan
June 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	The First Year of Fading Europe in 2022	Ye QiQuan
June 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	The colonized Europe.	Ye QiQuan
May 23, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	The local countries will definitely send troops into Ukraine.	Ye QiQuan
June 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	China will “reveal”or “whisper” its reliable nuclear forces by 2025	Ye QiQuan
June 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	China’s Cross-Strait Unification Action in 2026	Ye QiQuan
June 18, 2022	Feb. 18, 2023	The first year of G2 in 2026	Ye QiQuan

Declare Your First-released concept

Anyone can declare his/her First-released concepts, no matter they are released ever, are going to show up, or are on the way to come. The unique feather and first showing-up are the requirements only. Please submmit your First-released Concepts with all solid supportting reference sources. You also are most welcomed to publish your “First-released Concept/ Article/ Paper” in PPPNet.
Please complain to PPPNet as soon as you have any objection to any declaration listed on PPPNet website. If you submitt enough references to support your claim, every thing should be much better and easier.

Contribute Your Talent

Trust Yourself, Trust your Talent!

You’ve figured out the incompetence of all “Experts”, “Professors”, and “Political Science Professionals”, since you observe and review the relution of the Russia-Ukraine War.
Not only are they completely incapable to judge or predict the prospects and trends over this war, but what even worse is that they managed to prevent those different voices from theirs. Even those different prediction had been comfired as true continously.This is why this website is created.
It is now time for your voice, your thought, your prophecy, your analysis and your First-released Concept.
Trust your own judgment and your talent. Post your prediction and analysis of future significance. Or submit your new discovery when you explore history.
PPPNet is currently focused on the relationships about war, politics, economy, and philosophy. This website may not be a good place to communicate any superb war skill or any outstanding battle experience.
Think about war in politics and philosophy here. Approach subtle prophecy through reading present facts and exploring history truth here. Record down your first-released concepts into your resume, your family history, and the history books in future from PPPNet.

When you declare your “First-released Concept”, Please write down the “title”, “content of concept” and “references under APA style” and that is.

You will not be rejected with those cowardly and hypocritical “Academy Requirements”. The only requirement is your own thoughts, your new discoveries, and your First-released Concept. But you will build a trully high academy ceiterion. An article more than 1, 000 words should be good to explain or express a new concept/ unique analysis/ prediction or prophecy/ subtle relationship/ and so on.